Political animals
I am a retired suburban school teacher who taught younger grades for 33 years. All during my career, I was also a closeted transgendered person who was out only to my wife. After retirement, I vowed to fight oppression against transgendered people by becoming a political activist in their defence. I had seen scenes of discrimination and cruelty directed against vulnerable children whom both teachers and students stigmatized as being "different" and "queer." I had seldom raised my voice in their defense, either in the faculty lounge or in the classroom because I feared I would be found out and the hate and intolerance directed against the children would then be directed against me. It was not until near the end of my career that the public attention given the LGBT movementa movement composed of many brave souls willing to put themselves on the line in defense of human rights for themselves and othersinspired me to begin doing the same.
Today the transgendered issue that is in the news is whether the Employee Non-Discrimination Act ( ENDA ) before Congress that contains, in Nancy Pelosi's words, "controversial language" covering people whose gender-identity is challenged or in doubt. Sen. Durbin sponsored this bill. Why, then, you may wonder, would we attack Durbin by going to his office and refusing to leave? The answer is the same as what you could once have said about me as a teacher. It is not enough to be for something in your heart; it is not enough to stand passively by and hope things will turn out okay when discrimination and oppression are going on all around you; it is not enough to timidly speak up against oppression and hope against hope that speaking up will be enough, that you will not be called on to do more because then things might get costly and embarrassing!
Actions speak louder than words. We are judged by what we do.
What has Durbin done? He voted for the discriminatory "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" ( DADT ) in the military in 1993. He voted for the Defense of Marriage Act ( DOMA ) in 1996. Both pieces of legislation harm the LGBT community and highlight the fact we're second-class citizens, and both pieces of legislation were passed during a Democratic administration. Does Durbin regret his votes in the 1990s? If so, does he intend to do something about them to make things right as I am trying to do as a political activist in my retirement? No, he has showed himself unwilling to do these things before an election. He is playing it safe as I once did, and that is why I was in his office today. ( I wish somebody like me had been in my office 30 years ago! )
Nor is Durbin alone. All the Democrats are playing it safe on "controversial issues" like LGBT rights. They refuse to honor election promises made in 2008. They have disappointed Americans sick of war, immigrants hoping for humane immigration reform, workers hoping to join a union or just hang on to their jobs, people longing for a rational and just healthcare system, and homeowners hoping to save their homes.
With friends like the Democrats, who needs Republican enemies?
We, LGBT people and all working and nonworking Americans alike who dream of a better and more just country, need to divorce ourselves from the Democratic Party. We need to build a movement whose integrity and strength neither party can deny and that the Democrats can ignore only at their peril."
Roger Fraser
Gay Liberation Network