Windy City Media Group Frontpage News

THE VOICE OF CHICAGO'S GAY, LESBIAN, BI, TRANS AND QUEER COMMUNITY SINCE 1985

home search facebook twitter join
Gay News Sponsor
Donate

Sponsor
Sponsor

  WINDY CITY TIMES

Surveys show various views on gay marriage
Extended for the Online Edition of Windy City Times
by Lisa Keen, Keen News Service
2009-05-13

This article shared 3368 times since Wed May 13, 2009
facebook twitter google +1 reddit email


For the first time, two national polls show more support than opposition to gay marriage. Some state polls are showing similar results. But a third national poll suggests the balance in public opinion has not tipped profoundly enough that anyone can yet declare victory in the battle.

First, a CBS News-New York Times poll, released April 27, showed 42 percent surveyed believe gay couples should be allowed to legally marry, 25 percent supported civil unions, and only 28 percent said there should be no recognition at all. CBS-Times had been polling on that issue since March 2004, including in March of this year, but only in April of this year did support for gay marriage top the opposition to any recognition.

Then, an ABC News-Washington Post poll, released April 30, showed 49 percent surveyed believe gay marriages should be legal, and only 46 percent said "illegal." ABC-Post had been polling on the issue since September 2003 and, again, this was the first time support outweighed opposition.

Finally, a poll conducted by the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, also released April 30, found that 33 percent of its respondents supported legal marriage for gay couples, 26 percent supported only civil unions and 34 percent said gay couples "should not be allowed to obtain legal recognition of their relationship." Quinnipiac had asked the question only once before—in July 2008—and its comparison seemed to suggest some people who supported civil unions might now be moving toward opposition to any recognition.

Polls in various states have generally mirrored the national results. A Quinnipiac poll in New Jersey last month found 49 percent would support a law to allow same-sex couples to marry, 43 opposed, 8 percent didn't answer. A Field Poll in California in March found 48 percent would support repealing Proposition 8, which amended the constitution to ban gay marriage, while 47 percent would keep it. A Pan Atlantic poll in Maine last month showed 39 supported marriage equality, 35 percent supported only civil unions, and 23 opposed any recognition. Compared to a similar poll in March 2004, support for gay marriage had increased nine points, while opposition to any recognition dropped nine points.

Trending toward support

The latest national polls come on the heels of recent victories in Iowa and Vermont, and they come as the nation nears the five-year anniversary of the first licensing of gay marriage in the United States.

It is a mark that began on May 17, 2004, in Massachusetts but really picked up momentum last May when the California Supreme Court made it possible—at least for five months—for gay couples to obtain marriage licenses there, too. Then followed Connecticut late last year, and Iowa just last month. And it was last month that the Vermont legislature approved a bill that will enable gay couples to begin obtaining marriage licenses there in September.

Most of the polling in earnest on gay marriage began in 2003. CBS-Times took its first pulse on the issue in March, followed by ABC-Post in September. Those polls were taken before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its landmark decision—in November 2003—saying the state constitution requires gay couples be able to obtain marriage licenses the same as straight couples.

The CBS-Times poll asked "Which comes closest to your view: Gay couples should be allowed to legally marry OR gay couples should be allowed to form civil unions but not legally marry OR there should be no legal recognition of a gay couple's relationship?" As recently as March 2009, opponents of any recognition had outnumbered supporters of gay marriage—35 percent to 33 percent. But in April, support for marriage shot up from 33 percent to 42 percent, and opposition to any recognition dropped from 35 percent to 28 percent. There was little change in support for civil unions—27 percent in March, 25 percent in April. The margin of error was plus or minus three points. The CBS-Times poll surveyed 973 adults nationwide between April 22 and 26 and asked about gay marriage as question number 50 among 112 on a wide range of political issues.

The ABC-Post poll's question was worded much differently: "Do you think it should be legal or illegal for gay and lesbian/homosexual couples to get married?" The wording seems to imply there has been some contemplation of making it a crime for gay couples to get married. Instead, the public discourse has been generally along the lines of whether to allow gay couples to obtain marriage licenses. And the ABC-Post report has interpreted people's responses as indicating the latter. It also gave respondents an opportunity to indicate how strongly they held their views. Back in 2003, the ABC-Post poll found that 37 percent of their respondents believed gay marriages should be "legal," and 55 percent believed they should be "illegal;" with seven percent giving no response. The numbers grew against gay marriage to a high of 62 percent in August 2004—just three months after gay couples in Massachusetts started getting married. But in April 2009, 49 percent said they believe gay marriages should be "legal," and 46 percent believe they should be "illegal;" five percent had no response. The margin of error was plus or minus three points.

As the ABC-Post report explained, "for the first time in ABC-Post polls [ on gay marriage, ] supporters have outnumbered opponents." The "sharp shift," said the pollsters, "has occurred across ideological groups." Even conservatives have gone from 10 percent support in 2004 to 30 percent support now. The ABC-Post poll surveyed 1,072 adults nationwide between April 21 and 24 and asked about gay marriage as questions number 41 and 42 of 50 on a wide range of political issues.

Quinnipiac University Polling Institute conducted the third national poll, surveying 2,041 registered voters between April 21-27 and its results had a margin of error of 2.2 points, plus or minus. Quinnipiac asked eight questions about gay marriage, including: "Do you think same-sex couples should be allowed legally to marry, should be allowed legally to form civil unions but not marry, or should not be allowed to obtain legal recognition of their relationships?" Here, 33 percent chose marriage, 26 percent said civil unions, and 34 percent said they gay couples "should not be allowed to obtain legal recognition of their relationship." Quinnipiac framed the question another way too: "Would you support or oppose a law in your state that would allow same-sex couples to get married?" Support for a law went up, as did opposition. While 38 percent would support such a "law," 55 percent would oppose, and seven percent did not answer.

"There has been movement in our direction over the long term," said Patrick Egan, a polling expert and professor of politics at New York University. "But I don't read these polls as being short-term movement in response to Iowa or Vermont." Nine-point jumps over one month, like that shown in the CBS-Times poll, he said, are "very, very rare" and usually in response to such "huge events" as 9/11. What they do confirm, he said, "is a slow but steady upward trend—gaining about 1 percent per year" in support for gay marriage.

What's the question?

It would seem, then, that exactly how a question is phrased will have an impact on the results—something pollsters and poll watchers have known for a very long time. Still, even though these three polls asked the questions differently, there was some consistency in their trends. Two of the three national polls showed significantly more support for some form of legal recognition even during the height of opposition. In the CBS-Times poll, the height of opposition to any recognition came in November 2004—with 44 percent opposed and 53 percent agreeable to some form of recognition. For ABC-Post, it came in March 2004—with 62 percent opposed and 32 percent supportive.

But the Quinnipiac poll suggested the opposition to legal recognition might be growing. It provided data comparing its poll results in July 2008 with its results in April 2009. In July 2008, 29 percent of respondents opposed any recognition, where in April 2009, 34 percent opposed any recognition. Most of that change came from respondents who were supporting civil unions in 2008. Civil union support drop from 33 percent in 2008 to 26 percent in 2009; but support for marriage remained essentially even—32 percent in 2008, 33 percent in 2009—and the number not answering the question was six percent each year.

Both the ABC-Post and the Quinnipiac polls asked a question to determine whether respondents think their home states should recognize same-sex marriages licensed in other states. The ABC-Post poll results suggested yes ( 53 percent ) ; Quinnipiac suggested no ( 50 percent ) .

Again, the questions were worded very differently. ABC-Post asked "If a gay or lesbian couple gets legally married in another state, do you think that marriage should or should not be recognized as legal in your state?" Quinnipiac asked: "Under current federal law states can refuse to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states. Do you think this law should remain in existence or not?"

Interestingly, when Quinnipiac asked about the same federal law in a different way—a way that referred to people, not laws—the results reversed and nearly mirrored the ABC-Post results.

"Under current federal law spouses in same-sex marriages are denied eligibility for federal benefits. Do you think this law should remain in existence or not?" asked Quinnipiac. Asked this way, 54 percent were opposed to that federal law—Defense of Marriage Act ( DOMA ) —and 39 percent supported it, with seven percent not responding.

Under the Quinnipiac survey, 58 percent disagreed with the statement that "same-sex marriage is a threat to traditional marriage," but 51 percent said they do not believe it is discrimination to deny same-sex couples the right to a marriage license. Asked, "Who do you think should decide whether same-sex couples should be allowed to get married—your state legislature or your state courts?" 43 percent chose the legislature, 25 percent the courts, 16 percent said neither, 5 percent said both, and 12 percent had no answer.


This article shared 3368 times since Wed May 13, 2009
facebook twitter google +1 reddit email

  ARTICLES YOU MIGHT LIKE

Gay News

WORLD Japan ruling, Kenya groups, World Cup, Almodovar 2022-12-04
Video below - A district court in the Tokyo Prefecture ruled that Japan's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage is legal, according to The Washington Blade. In a statement to Reuters, plaintiffs' attorney Nobuhito Sawasaki said, "This is actually a ...


Gay News

NATIONAL Trans officials, marriage equality, Karl Schmid, Pelosi, Buttigieg 2022-12-04
Video below - Once all of the newly elected officials are seated, there will be nine transgender state legislators (up from eight this year) and nine non-binary state legislators across the country, NBC News noted, citing The Victory Institute. ...


Gay News

Landmark step toward equality: Senate passes bipartisan Respect for Marriage Act 2022-11-29
-- From press releases - WASHINGTON — The Human Rights Campaign (HRC) — the nation's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ+) civil rights organization — today celebrated the bipartisan passage of the Respect ...


Gay News

NATIONAL Respect for Marriage Act, lesbian judge, gay official resigns 2022-11-20
- Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) said that debate on the Respect for Marriage Act (RFMA) is suspended and will continue on Nov. 28, when the Senate reconvenes after Thanksgiving, LGBTQ Nation reported. The RFMA ...


Gay News

Senate marriage equality bill advances with 62-37 bipartisan vote 2022-11-16
- A bipartisan group of U.S. Senators voted 62-37 for cloture—the end of debate—for the Respect for Marriage Act (RMA), signaling passage in the near future for the measure that enshrines marriage equality into federal law. The ...


Gay News

Rights advocates: Nov. 16 Senate vote a 'backstop' against SCOTUS overreach 2022-11-16
- Representatives from HRC and GLAD met with media virtually the morning of Nov. 16 to discuss the implications of the Respect of Marriage Act. That legislation, scheduled for a Senate vote the same day, codifies marriage ...


Gay News

Reports: Senate to vote on marriage equality law Nov. 16 2022-11-15
- The U.S. Senate will vote on a measure enshrining marriage equality into law Wednesday, according to reports. Supporters of the measure, known as the Respect for Marriage Act, which aims to protect against an eventual repeal ...


Gay News

WORLD Indian judge, marriage items, LGBTQ+-friendly countries 2022-11-13
- A judge who could pave the way to legalizing marriage equality in India took charge as chief justice, Bloomberg reported. As a judge on the top court, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud was a member of the five-member ...


Gay News

Actress Rebel Wilson gets engaged, announces birth of first child [UPDATE] 2022-11-05
- Actress Rebel Wilson (Pitch Perfect) is engaged to girlfriend Ramona Agruma after dating for seven months, according to Page Six. ...


Gay News

Last Mexican state approves marriage equality 2022-10-27
- On Oct. 27, Mexico's northeastern border state of Tamaulipas voted to recognize same-sex marriage, making it legal in every district in the country, Reuters reported. In its official Twitter account, the congress of Tamaulipas approved the ...


Gay News

Calif. judge rules for anti-LGBTQ+ baker in wedding-cake case 2022-10-24
- In California, a judge has ruled in favor of a bakery owner who refused to make wedding cakes for a same-sex couple because it violated her Christian beliefs, according to a U.S. News & World Report ...


Gay News

Singapore moves to legalize male same-sex relations, protect definition of marriage 2022-10-21
- On Oct. 20, Singapore's government filed bills in parliament seeking to decriminalize sex between men, and to amend the constitution to prevent court challenges to laws and policies concerning marriage, Reuters reported. The proposed legislation in ...


Gay News

Slovenia legalizes marriage equality, adoption 2022-10-05
- Slovenia has become the first Eastern European country to legalize same-sex marriage and adoption. The historic moment has come about after a six-to-three Constitutional Court decision in July said that same-sex marriage and adoption are constitutional ...


Gay News

Cuba legalizes same-sex marriage 2022-09-26
- Cuba has legalized marriage equality after Cubans voted in favor of a family code that increased protections for minorities on the island, CNN reported. With 94% of the votes counted as of 8 a.m. CT on ...


Gay News

NATIONAL Marriage bill, drag queen dies, Dutch queen visits, university sued 2022-09-18
- A bipartisan group of senators trying to pass same-sex marriage protection legislation pushed a vote until after the November election—a move the officials say increases their chances of success but avoids forcing the GOP on record ...


 




Copyright © 2022 Windy City Media Group. All rights reserved.
Reprint by permission only. PDFs for back issues are downloadable from
our online archives. Single copies of back issues in print form are
available for $4 per issue, older than one month for $6 if available,
by check to the mailing address listed below.

Return postage must accompany all manuscripts, drawings, and
photographs submitted if they are to be returned, and no
responsibility may be assumed for unsolicited materials.
All rights to letters, art and photos sent to Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago
Gay and Lesbian News and Feature Publication) will be treated
as unconditionally assigned for publication purposes and as such,
subject to editing and comment. The opinions expressed by the
columnists, cartoonists, letter writers, and commentators are
their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay,
Lesbian, Bisexual and Transegender News and Feature Publication).

The appearance of a name, image or photo of a person or group in
Nightspots (Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times
(a Chicago Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender News and Feature
Publication) does not indicate the sexual orientation of such
individuals or groups. While we encourage readers to support the
advertisers who make this newspaper possible, Nightspots (Chicago
GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay, Lesbian
News and Feature Publication) cannot accept responsibility for
any advertising claims or promotions.

 
 

TRENDINGBREAKINGPHOTOS







Sponsor


 

Sponsor


Donate


About WCMG      Contact Us      Online Front  Page      Windy City  Times      Nightspots
Identity      BLACKlines      En La Vida      Archives      Advanced Search     
Windy City Queercast      Queercast Archives     
Press  Releases      Join WCMG  Email List      Email Blast      Blogs     
Upcoming Events      Todays Events      Ongoing Events      Bar Guide      Community Groups      In Memoriam     
Privacy Policy     

Windy City Media Group publishes Windy City Times,
The Bi-Weekly Voice of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Trans Community.
5315 N. Clark St. #192, Chicago, IL 60640-2113 • PH (773) 871-7610 • FAX (773) 871-7609.