Windy City Media Group Frontpage News

THE VOICE OF CHICAGO'S GAY, LESBIAN, BI, TRANS AND QUEER COMMUNITY SINCE 1985

home search facebook twitter join
Gay News Sponsor Windy City Times 2021-09-01
DOWNLOAD ISSUE
Donate

Sponsor
Sponsor

  WINDY CITY TIMES

Supreme Court: Stunning progress
by Lisa Keen, Keen News Service
2014-10-12

This article shared 2772 times since Sun Oct 12, 2014
facebook twitter google +1 reddit email


If state bans against same-sex marriages were a table, the striking down of the Defense of Marriage Act last year was like the loss of a leg. The announcement last week that the U.S. Supreme Court would not hear appeals to keep such bans on the books was like the loss of a second leg. The table has fallen. All that is left is for the Supreme Court to remove the final two legs —by declaring that such bans are unconstitutional and by ensuring that its declaration does not provide a way for any individual state to continue its ban.

The stunning rapidity with which much of this has already happened has left even the most seasoned LGBT activist in awe. Yes, it took 10 years to go from the first trial in Hawaii to the landmark ruling in Massachusetts. And yes, it took roughly another 10 years to witness the decimation of the most harmful part of DOMA. But the number of states —either by legislative action or court order— enforcing the principle of equal protection in marriage law has climbed dramatically and steeply in the past 12 months —from 14 in October 2013 to 29 so far this month.

And the victory is not in numbers only. The states that have entered the equality column with regards to the right to marry include some of the nation's most conservative: Utah, West Virginia, and North Carolina, across four circuits: the Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth.

There have been some breath-holding moments: Two days after the U.S. Supreme Court refused, on October 6, to hear seven petitions concerning five state bans on same-sex marriage, there was a bit of a puzzlement, even pause. On October 7, the Ninth Circuit declared bans in Nevada and Idaho to be unconstitutional, but Justice Anthony Kennedy granted a stay against that circuit's decision — a stay very much like the ones the Supreme Court had just lifted in three other circuits.

The Ninth Circuit decision had been issued by a three-judge panel, so Idaho had a right to ask the full Ninth Circuit to hear an appeal, and it plans to press that appeal.

The puzzlement was that Kennedy's order included Nevada, and Nevada state officials had not asked for a stay. They had not defended their ban in court and they were ready to enforce the Ninth Circuit panel decision. Why would Kennedy include Nevada?

Turns out: It was apparently a mistake and, within hours, Kennedy removed Nevada from the stay. By Friday, the entire court lifted the stay on the Ninth Circuit panel decision. Not one justice registered a dissent.

The Supreme Court had already surprised many court observers on the first day of its 2014 session when it declined to hear appeals from the five states regarding the constitutionality of state laws that ban marriage licenses or even recognition of marriages for same-sex couples. The surprise was not that the court declined to hear the appeals; a number of seasoned court watchers suggested that scenario because all the lower courts —three federal circuits and five federal district court judges— had agreed such bans are unconstitutional. The Supreme Court does not tend to get involved in disputes where all the courts below agree.

The surprise was that the Supreme Court announced its decision so soon. It had sat on previous LGBT-related cases ( DOMA and Proposition 8 ) for weeks before announcing whether it would hear those appeals. The court receives about 10,000 requests each year to review lower court decisions and accepts only about 75 to 80 of those. In order to accept a case, at least four of the nine justices must agree to do so.

So, in the case of the marriage ban appeals, there were not four justices who wanted to grant the reviews. That meant six justices said 'No, we don't want to hear any of these marriage cases.'

Those six justices knew that, by denying the appeals, the Supreme Court was allowing at least five —and perhaps as many as 11— states to begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples immediately.

"I would say the Supreme Court gave an unmistakable signal to lower courts and the remaining states that it is unconstitutional to deny gay people the freedom to marry and equal protection and respect under the law," said Evan Wolfson, head of the national Freedom to Marry group.

That quickly became the assessment of court observers and state officials across the country. Some expressed that assessment in a way that, while technically incorrect, captured the spirit of the Supreme Court's impact. The West Virginia governor and attorney general both issued statements indicating they believed the Supreme Court had made it "clear that laws banning same-sex marriage have been declared unconstitutional."

At least two states are still clinging to the edge of the marriage ban table: On Thursday, the Supreme Court of South Carolina issued an order preventing state judges from issuing marriage licenses to any same-sex couples until a decision is made by a federal court in South Carolina. It's a long shot effort: The Fourth Circuit, which includes South Carolina, has ruled such bans are unconstitutional. But the Fourth Circuit decision came from a three-judge panel, and South Carolina is apparently pinning its hopes on getting from the full Fourth Circuit bench a decision that counters that of the three-judge panel. The Kansas Supreme Court also issued a decision, last Friday, ordering a county clerk to stop issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

And some supporters of bans on same-sex marriage point out that the Supreme Court is simply waiting for a circuit to come up with a ruling that is in conflict with the four appeals courts that have previously ruled. They note that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in a recent public appearance that a decision contrary to these other appeals courts would create a greater "urgency" for the Supreme Court to take a marriage case.

But if there was any real likelihood that the Supreme Court might eventually uphold the constitutionality of such bans, it seems quite unlikely that six justices would have rushed to announce on the first day of the court's 2014 session that it would allow lower court rulings in as many as 11 states to go into effect, enabling same-sex couples to marry almost immediately in those states. Why create the potential need for years of corrective legal action when the court could simply wait for the right case to come along and then make its decision?

What last Monday's announcement means, as Wisconsin Republican Governor Scott Walker acknowledged in a statement on the campaign trail, is that the issue of the constitutionality of denying same-sex couples the right to marry is "resolved": Such bans are unconstitutional and the Supreme Court will most likely say so if one of the remaining circuits issues a decision to the contrary.

The Sixth Circuit could issue its decision any day now. The Fifth Circuit announced September 25 that a three-judge panel would hear appeals from both Texas and Louisiana, but briefs in the Louisiana case are not expected to be completed until November 7.

Meanwhile, more states within the circuits that have already declared the bans unconstitutional may soon join the pro-equality list. A federal judge issued a ruling Sunday, October 12, that Alaska's ban is unconstitutional. A federal judge has given Arizona until this Thursday, October 16, to file briefs explaining why it should not comply with the Ninth Circuit panel ruling.

© 2014 Keen News Service. All rights reserved.


This article shared 2772 times since Sun Oct 12, 2014
facebook twitter google +1 reddit email





Windy City Media Group does not approve or necessarily agree with the views posted below.
Please do not post letters to the editor here. Please also be civil in your dialogue.
If you need to be mean, just know that the longer you stay on this page, the more you help us.


  ARTICLES YOU MIGHT LIKE

Gay News

[UPDATE] Lisle school offers job to lacrosse coach in same-sex marriage 2021-09-21
- The administration at Lisle’s Benet Academy, a west suburban Catholic school, has reversed course and offered a job to a woman in a same-sex marriage after initially rescinding the offer, The Chicago Tribune reported. ...


Gay News

Pope again refuses to bless same-sex marriages 2021-09-18
- Pope Francis told reporters recently on a return flight from Hungary that the Catholic Church is unable to bless same-sex marriages because marriage is a divine sacrament between a man and a woman, per The Advocate. ...


Gay News

Polis marriage marks first same-sex wedding of sitting governor 2021-09-17
- On Sept. 15, Colorado Democratic Gov. Jared Polis wed longtime partner Marlon Reis—marking the first same-sex marriage of a sitting U.S. governor, NPR reported. Polis keeps making history. In 2018, Polis became the first openly gay ...


Gay News

LGBTQ advocates celebrate two Illinois marriage certificate modernization bills 2021-07-27
--From a press release - Trans and non-binary people who were married in Illinois will now be able to obtain marriage certificates that reflect their authentic selves thanks to legislation signed today by Governor JB Pritzker, according to Equality Illinois and ...


Gay News

WORLD Marriage in Chile, Polish website, Toronto news, 'Reclaim Pride' march 2021-07-25
- On July 21, Chile's Senate approved an equal-marriage bill, DW.com reported. The regulations were presented during the second government of the socialist Michelle Bachelet (2014-2018) and last June 1, during ...


Gay News

LGBTQ advocates celebrate passage of Illinois marriage certificate name change legislation 2021-05-28
--From a press release - LGBTQ advocates are celebrating passage of state legislation that will provide certainty for individuals requesting that their Illinois marriage certificates reflect a legal name change. HB 2590 is an initiative of Equality Illinois and Chicago House ...


Gay News

LGBT-inclusive marriage-certificate act passes state General Assembly 2021-05-21
--From a press release - May 21. 2021 - In an effort to modernize marriage certificates in Illinois, state Sen. Sara Feigenholtz and state Rep. Ann Williams helped pass The Marriage Certificate Modernization Act through the Illinois General Assembly. The legislation ...


Gay News

Starting May 3, ceremonies in Cook County's downtown Marriage Court can be performed by Zoom 2021-04-30
- CHICAGO (April 30) — Marriage and civil union ceremonies at Cook County's downtown Marriage and Civil Union Court (Marriage Court) may be performed via Zoom videoconference, as well as in person, starting next week, according to ...


Gay News

Illinois Senate passes proposal removing gendered language from marriage certificates 2021-04-21
--From a press release - On April 21, on its third reading, the Illinois Senate passed (by a bipartisan vote of 44-13) a proposal that amends the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act to allow the removal of gendered language ...


Gay News

Russian leader Putin officially bans same-sex marriage 2021-04-08
- On April 5, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed into law a series of constitutional amendments that, among other things, formally defines marriage as between a man and a woman in the country, The Washington Blade reported. ...


Gay News

Global momentum for marriage equality surges,"Freedom to Marry Global" website created 2021-03-31
--From a freedomtomarry.org press release - April 1st marks twenty years since the Netherlands ended the exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage, becoming the first of so far 30 countries worldwide to affirm the freedom to marry for same-sex couples. Now, two ...


Gay News

WORLD Landmark ruling, Montreal's Gay Village, acid attack, anti-LGBTQ laws 2021-03-21
- In a landmark ruling, a Japanese court ruled that the government's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, NPR noted. Article 24 of Japan's constitution defines marriage as based on the "mutual consent of both sexes," which ...


Gay News

LETTER The Vatican's words and actions do not echo love 2021-03-18
- The LGBTQA community is responding with shock, anger and frustration at the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith statement concerning same-sex unions. Many in our community can't understand why Pope Francis would allow such a ...


Gay News

Pope Francis documentary 'Francesco' to debut March 26 2021-03-16
- Pope Francis—in the news lately because of the Catholic Church's stance that it cannot bless same-sex unions, adding that it is "not licit" to bless relationships that involve sexual activity outside of marriage—is the subject of ...


Gay News

DignityUSA: Vatican denying same-sex blessings "Exacerbates pain and anger" 2021-03-16
--From a press release - March 15, 2021. DignityUSA, the organization of Catholics working for justice, equality, and full inclusion of LGBTQI people in the church and society, is deeply disappointed by the Vatican's statement unequivocally denying blessings to same-sex coupl ...


 



Copyright © 2021 Windy City Media Group. All rights reserved.
Reprint by permission only. PDFs for back issues are downloadable from
our online archives. Single copies of back issues in print form are
available for $4 per issue, older than one month for $6 if available,
by check to the mailing address listed below.

Return postage must accompany all manuscripts, drawings, and
photographs submitted if they are to be returned, and no
responsibility may be assumed for unsolicited materials.
All rights to letters, art and photos sent to Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago
Gay and Lesbian News and Feature Publication) will be treated
as unconditionally assigned for publication purposes and as such,
subject to editing and comment. The opinions expressed by the
columnists, cartoonists, letter writers, and commentators are
their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay,
Lesbian, Bisexual and Transegender News and Feature Publication).

The appearance of a name, image or photo of a person or group in
Nightspots (Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times
(a Chicago Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender News and Feature
Publication) does not indicate the sexual orientation of such
individuals or groups. While we encourage readers to support the
advertisers who make this newspaper possible, Nightspots (Chicago
GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay, Lesbian
News and Feature Publication) cannot accept responsibility for
any advertising claims or promotions.

 

 

 

TRENDINGBREAKINGPHOTOS







Sponsor
Sponsor


 



Donate


About WCMG      Contact Us      Online Front  Page      Windy City  Times      Nightspots      OUT! Guide     
Identity      BLACKlines      En La Vida      Archives      Advanced Search     
Windy City Queercast      Queercast Archives     
Press  Releases      Join WCMG  Email List      Email Blast      Blogs     
Upcoming Events      Todays Events      Ongoing Events      Bar Guide      Community Groups      In Memoriam      Outguide Categories      Outguide Advertisers      Search Outguide      Travel      Dining Out      Privacy Policy     

Windy City Media Group publishes Windy City Times,
The Bi-Weekly Voice of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Trans Community.
5315 N. Clark St. #192, Chicago, IL 60640-2113 • PH (773) 871-7610 • FAX (773) 871-7609.