Windy City Media Group Frontpage News

THE VOICE OF CHICAGO'S GAY, LESBIAN, BI, TRANS AND QUEER COMMUNITY SINCE 1985

home search facebook twitter join
Gay News Sponsor Windy City Times 2023-12-13
DOWNLOAD ISSUE
Donate

Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor

  WINDY CITY TIMES

Mass. Marriage Impact Unknown
by BOB ROEHR AND TRACY BAIM
2003-11-26

This article shared 2423 times since Wed Nov 26, 2003
facebook twitter google +1 reddit email


Does it or doesn't it? That's the question being bantered about one week after the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marraige should be legal in that state.

Strongly written articles have come down on the side of interpreting the decision as leaving no room for anything except same-sex marriage on par with heterosexual marriage. Equally vocal are those who say that there is "wiggle room" to make a compromise similar to the civil-unions effort of Vermont.

One thing is certain—if full marriage does come for Massachusetts' gays and lesbians, its ramifications will be felt throughout the country.

The Massachusetts Supreme Court last week finessed the issue of gay marriage. It agreed that same-sex couples have the right to wed but left it to the legislature to determine how that will be carried out. It gave them 180 days to do so.

What is up for debate is just what they mean—did they mean make it exact equal marriage, or did they mean find a compromise? The state's governor and other political leaders are outraged at the ruling and say they will fight it—although that state Supreme Court decision can not be appealed. The interpretation will be what is up for grabs. If the legislature says the court was leaving room for civil unions, and they pass those lesser rights, the lawyer and clients who just won the recent case vow to continue the fight.

A decision on the case, known as Goodridge vs. Department of Public Health, had been expected months ago, but it was issued on Nov. 18. The 4-3 decision was closer than most observers had anticipated.

The majority opinion, written by Chief Justice Margaret Marshall, said, "The Massachusetts Constitution affirms the dignity and equality of all individuals. It forbids the creation of second-class citizens ... the Commonwealth [of Massachusetts] has failed to identify any constitutionally adequate reason for denying civil marriage to same-sex couples."

Reviewing state marriage law and its implementation, it summarized, "In short, for all the joy and solemnity that normally attend a marriage [the law] governing entrance to marriage is a licensing law."

It rejected the state's argument that procreation is the primary purpose of marriage. It said, "The exclusive and permanent commitment of the marriage partners to one another ... [is] the sine qua non of marriage."

The decision cited "the immeasurable advantages that flow from the assurance of a 'a stable family structure in which children will be reared, educated, and socialized,'" and found no rational basis "to penalize children by depriving them of State benefits" because of their parents' sexual orientation.

"The marriage ban works a deep and scarring hardship on a very real segment of the community for no rational reason."

Rather than throw out the marriage law as unconstitutional, it remanded the case to the trial court and delayed its implementation for 180 days "to permit the Legislature to take such action as it may deem appropriate in light of this opinion."

Justice John M. Greaney concurred with the majority but would have gone farther. Using "equal protection" analysis, he would order immediate issuance of a marriage license. Delaying the remedy "on the grounds that the couples are of the same gender, constitutes a categorical restriction of a fundamental right."

The three dissenters, in a decision penned by Justice Robert J. Corday, argued, "The court has transmuted the 'right' to marry into a right to change the institution of marriage."

They drew upon U.S. Supreme Court decisions that tied the "fundamental" right to marry "primarily on the underlying interest of every individual in procreation, which, historically, could only legally occur within the construct of marriage because sexual intercourse outside of marriage was a criminal act."

"... No matter how personal or intimate a decision to marry someone of the same sex might be, the right to make it is not guaranteed by the right of personal autonomy."

Corday's dissent acknowledged that plaintiffs had made a powerful case for the extension of the benefits and burdens of civil marriage to same-sex couples, but he argued, "that decision must be made by the legislature, not the court."

Justice Martha B. Sosman, in a separate dissent that was joined by the two other judges, argued that the legislature should not tinker with the traditional definition of marriage until it is sure that it will not adversely affect this critical institution within society. She advocated a circular Catch-22-type approach that would defer gay marriage until society reached a consensus that the idea in the abstraction was a good one.

"This is a momentous legal and cultural milestone. The law caught up with the reality that gay people and families are part of the fabric of our communities," said Mary L. Bonauto. She is an attorney with Gay & Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD), the Boston-based group that represented the gay couples.

"This is a proud moment for our family," said lead plaintiff Hillary Goodridge. "We no longer have to explain to our eight-year-old daughter why we can't marry, or that we love each other even though we are not married. And more importantly, we'll be able to provide Annie with the full protections under marriage" that we cannot provide now.

"We hope that our fellow Americans will treat these new marriages just like they want their own to be treated, offering respect and support to these couples," said David Buckel, director of Lambda Legal's Marriage Project. Lambda is appealing a lower court decision on marriage in New Jersey.

"Our U.S. Supreme Court victory [on sodomy] pushed open a door that had been locked for gay people for decades," said Kevin Cathcart, executive director of Lambda Legal. "Today's decision is in that same spirit. We will build on our victory and deliver its promise to gay people in all areas of life, including relationship recognition, parenting, schools, and employment."

Yet even amidst the celebrating there were warnings of caution. "We are also preparing our families for an onslaught of attacks by right-wing activists," said Dave Noble, executive director of National Stonewall Democrats. "The ruling is the beginning, not the end, of our struggle for all marriages to be treated equally."

The Family Research Council is leading the right-wing charge. "This is a wake-up call for both the American public and our elected officials," said FRC president Tony Perkins, predicting the apocalypse.

"If we do not amend the Massachusetts State Constitution so that it explicitly protects marriage as the union of one man and one woman, and if we do not amend the U.S. Constitution with a federal marriage amendment [FMA] that will protect marriage on the federal level, we will lose marriage in this nation."

"We must amend the Constitution if we are to stop a tyrannical judiciary from redefining marriage to the point of extinction." Most leading Democratic political leaders have embraced a traditional definition of marriage as between a man and a woman, and yet have opposed amending the Constitution. Their Republican counterparts have been wary of embracing a constitutional amendment, pending the Massachusetts decision.

The court's involvement of the legislature in the process of creating gay marriage may offer a sufficient olive branch to deter the Bush administration from jumping on the marriage amendment bandwagon. Only time, and polling data, will tell. Meanwhile, the earliest a state constitutional amendment could be put before voters would be 2006. That means if marriage is implemented in 2004, there would be a two-year window where gays and lesbians would be allowed to marry. If the sky does not fall in, and massive numbers of heterosexual marriages are not destroyed by the new law, that new reality may be enough to convince voters to keep same-sex marriage for good. ---------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------


This article shared 2423 times since Wed Nov 26, 2003
facebook twitter google +1 reddit email

Out and Aging
Presented By

  ARTICLES YOU MIGHT LIKE

Gay News

Thailand parliament passes landmark marriage bill 2024-03-27
- On March 27, Thailand's parliament approved a marriage-equality bill by an overwhelmingly large margin—a landmark step that moves one of Asia's most liberal countries closer to legalizing same-sex unions, media ...


Gay News

NATIONAL Va. marriage bill, AARP, online counseling, Idaho items, late activist 2024-03-21
- Republican Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin signed bills protecting same-sex marriages at a state level, surprising some, WRIC reported. The bills—passed out of both chambers along mostly party lines—will require clerks ...


Gay News

Greek legislature approves marriage equality 2024-02-15
- Greece has become the 36th country, and the first Christian Orthodox-majority one, to legalize same-sex marriage. The BBC reported that same-sex couples will now also be legally allowed to adopt children after the 176-76 vote that ...


Gay News

Tenn. legislators back bill that lets officials refuse to perform same-sex weddings 2024-02-15
- Defying a national ruling that authorized marriage equality, Tennessee lawmakers approved a measure that would allow public officials to refuse to perform weddings of same-sex couples, The Hill reported. Tennessee's House Bill 878/Senate Bill 596 says ...


Gay News

WORLD Marriage in Greece, UK politics, cruise death, HRC grants 2024-02-02
- The Holy Synod of the Church of Greece unanimously agreed at a recent meeting that it is "strongly opposed" to the Greek government's promised bill on same-sex marriage and adoption, Balkan Insight reported. The conservative New ...


Gay News

NATIONAL Marriage news, fighting fentanyl, anti-LGBTQ+ crimes, Grindr 2024-02-02
- The Virginia House of Delegates passed a bill that would affirm marriage equality in the state, The Washington Blade noted. House Bill 174, introduced by state Del. Rozia Henson (D-Prince William County), passed in the Democratic-controlled ...


Gay News

WORLD Activist honored, marriages in Estonia, Madrid law, trans sports item 2024-01-05
Video below - The National AIDS Commission (NAC) recently honored Caleb Orozco—a leading figure in the fight for LGBTQ+ rights in Belize—for his instrumental contributions to the national HIV response, BNN reported. According ...


Gay News

Catholic Church allows priests to bless same-sex couples but reaffirms disapproval of gay marriage 2023-12-22
- LGBTQ+ couples can now receive blessings from priests, but the Catholic Church maintained its strict ban on gay marriage, according to a Vatican document approved by Pope Francis Dec. 18. This historic change in doctrine marks ...


Gay News

Greek government vows to back marriage equality 2023-12-22
- Despite opposition from the Church of Greece and within the ruling New Democracy, Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis' government said it will eventually move to legalize same-sex marriage, The National Herald reported. However, no timetable was ...


Gay News

Dignity/Chicago welcomes new rule on church blessings for same-sex marriages 2023-12-18
--From a press release - Dignity/Chicago, the advocacy organization for LGBTQI Catholics and friends, welcomed the news that the Vatican's doctrinal office has officially declared it possible for Catholic priests to bless same-sex unions and ...


Gay News

New Ways Ministry: Pope's blessings approval is Christmas gift to LGBTQ+ Catholics 2023-12-18
--From a press release - MOUNT RAINIER, Maryland—Statement by Francis DeBernardo, Executive Director, New Ways Ministry: Pope Francis gave LGBTQ+ Catholics an early Christmas gift this year by approving blessings for same-gender couples. The Vatican ...


Gay News

Pope Francis changes policy, allowing priests to bless same-sex unions; GLAAD responds 2023-12-18
--From a press release - GLAAD: "By removing barriers to priests blessing LGBTQ couples, the Pope accurately recognizes that LGBTQ people and our relationships are worthy of the same affirmation and support in the Church, and this strengthens couples in their ...


Gay News

LGBTQ+ couple the first in South Asia to have marriage recognized 2023-11-30
- Transgender woman Maya Gurung and Surendra Pandey became the first LGBTQ+ couple to have their marriage legally recognized in South Asia after they received a legal certificate in Nepal's Lamjung district on Nov. 29, The Guardian ...


Gay News

WORLD Thai marriage law, French bill, Miss Universe, IKEA, activist dies 2023-11-24
- Thailand Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin said that the cabinet approved a draft law on marriage equality and that it would be brought to parliament during a session starting in December, Reuters reported. If the draft law ...


Gay News

Pope: Trans people can be baptized and act as godparents 2023-11-09
- Pope Francis has stated that trans people may be baptized and act as godparents or witnesses to marriage under the same conditions as any other adult—as long as a scandal does not result, according to PinkNews. ...


 


Copyright © 2024 Windy City Media Group. All rights reserved.
Reprint by permission only. PDFs for back issues are downloadable from
our online archives.

Return postage must accompany all manuscripts, drawings, and
photographs submitted if they are to be returned, and no
responsibility may be assumed for unsolicited materials.

All rights to letters, art and photos sent to Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago
Gay and Lesbian News and Feature Publication) will be treated
as unconditionally assigned for publication purposes and as such,
subject to editing and comment. The opinions expressed by the
columnists, cartoonists, letter writers, and commentators are
their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay,
Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender News and Feature Publication).

The appearance of a name, image or photo of a person or group in
Nightspots (Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times
(a Chicago Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender News and Feature
Publication) does not indicate the sexual orientation of such
individuals or groups. While we encourage readers to support the
advertisers who make this newspaper possible, Nightspots (Chicago
GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay, Lesbian
News and Feature Publication) cannot accept responsibility for
any advertising claims or promotions.

 
 

TRENDINGBREAKINGPHOTOS







Sponsor


 



Donate


About WCMG      Contact Us      Online Front  Page      Windy City  Times      Nightspots
Identity      BLACKlines      En La Vida      Archives      Advanced Search     
Windy City Queercast      Queercast Archives     
Press  Releases      Join WCMG  Email List      Email Blast      Blogs     
Upcoming Events      Todays Events      Ongoing Events      Bar Guide      Community Groups      In Memoriam     
Privacy Policy     

Windy City Media Group publishes Windy City Times,
The Bi-Weekly Voice of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Trans Community.
5315 N. Clark St. #192, Chicago, IL 60640-2113 • PH (773) 871-7610 • FAX (773) 871-7609.