Windy City Media Group Frontpage News

THE VOICE OF CHICAGO'S GAY, LESBIAN, BI, TRANS AND QUEER COMMUNITY SINCE 1985

home search facebook twitter join
Gay News Sponsor Pre-order Book!
Pre-order Book!
Donate

Sponsor
Sponsor

  WINDY CITY TIMES

MARRIAGE WIN
2004-07-21

This article shared 4497 times since Wed Jul 21, 2004
facebook twitter google +1 reddit email


NEWS ANALYSIS BY BOB ROEHR

Gays and lesbians are grateful that the Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA) was defeated on a procedural vote, but they can take little solace in the substance and tone of the proceedings leading up to that vote.

Social conservatives lost in trying to impose their values on the body politic, no matter how they try to spin the outcome. They also deepened the rifts between themselves and traditional conservatives and moderates within the Republican Party, which will make future attempts at social legislation more difficult.

Most Democrats harped on the fact that, gasp, the Republicans were playing politics with the issue; all the while promoting their own set of political priorities. There was not a lot of defense of the gay community—one of its most loyal constituencies in terms of votes, workers, and dollars—which may signal a rocky future for that relationship.

On the religious right, Sen. Rick Santorum hyperventilated, 'The future of the country hangs in the balance because the future of marriage hangs in the balance. Isn't that the ultimate homeland security, standing up and defending marriage?'

Most of his colleagues simply rolled their eyes in response. They knew that had the Senate voted on the substance of the FMA, rather than on the procedure where it was easier for the Republican leadership to apply some discipline, it would have lost by an even wider margin.

Advocates for the FMA tried to spin the extent of their loss. 'This is only the opening salvo in a long battle to preserve the definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman—a battle we are determined to win,' vowed Focus on the Family's founder James Dobson.

But Ken Sherrill, a doyen of gay political science scholars and a professor at Hunter College in New York City, doesn't buy the right's spin. 'What was different about the FMA vote is that it went to the floor without making it through the Judiciary Committee,' because it did not have the votes in committee. 'I don't think that [Majority Leader Bill] Frist can play that game very often.'

'It's over,' conservative gay columnist Andrew Sullivan said on his blog. 'The antigay forces couldn't even muster a simple majority for their constitutional amendment. They have divided their party and tarnished their reputation for fairness—but the Constitution remains intact and unviolated. That's one reason to cheer.'

But beyond the delight of blocking an initiative of their opponents on the right, there was precious little the GLBT community could find reassuring.

'The vote was far from a ringing endorsement for equal rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people,' said Matt Foreman, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.

'Over and over again we heard even our staunchest allies repeating ad nauseam the mantra, 'I believe that marriage is between one man and one woman' or the ever popular, 'While I do not support gay marriage.' Not a single Senator stood up and said he or she was voting against the amendment because marriage is a fundamental right that same-sex couples should enjoy under the Constitution.'

'If the Senate actually reflected and articulated the views of the American public, at least one-third of them would have actually argued for marriage equality and the basic rights of all Americans,' Foreman continued. 'The message should have been that this year's election will not be won on our backs.'

'The marriage amendment was voted down only after a procession of senators promised there were easier ways to stop us from wedding. This is victory?' wrote Chris Crain in an editorial that appeared in the Washington Blade and other Window Media newspapers.

'If 'pro-gay' senators won't defend our equality or our dignity even when they have the votes in the bag, what can we expect when their arguments about the Defense of Marriage Act don't work anymore?'

'The movement for marriage equality, 'led' by the HRC [Human Rights Campaign], is unfortunately suffering from the 'soft activism of no expectations.''

He criticized HRC for 'squandering' more than a million bucks 'on advertisements that never mentioned the 'G' word and instead tried to change the subject to taxes and Iraq.'

HRC employed the same media strategy—avoiding gay content and trying to shift the argument—in 'defending' gay marriage in referendums in Hawaii in 1998 and California in 2000. Neither proved effective and the antigay measures passed.

Crain concluded, 'We will not trick our way to equality while everyone is looking the other way. The case for our freedom to marry is a strong one, and it's way past time we started making it.'

The Kerry/ Edwards Democratic presidential team skipped the FMA vote, the only Senators to do so. The campaign staff said that Kerry was in Boston 'preparing' for the Democratic National Convention, Edwards left to campaign in Iowa. 'That hardly makes them profiles in courage,' the Philadelphia Inquirer said in an editorial.

During the preceding month the Kerry/ Edwards campaign raked in over $600,000 at gay fundraisers in Boston and New York.

The day after the FMA vote Kerry was in Philadelphia at the NAACP convention. He criticized George W. Bush for claiming that a scheduling conflict kept him from addressing that group. 'When you're President of the United States, you can pretty much say where you want to be and when,' Kerry roared.

And, as political scientist Sherrill noted, 'The same holds true for presidential candidates and casting votes on the floor of the Senate. It's all a matter of priorities.'

Those facts seem to be resonating at the grassroots within the gay community.

'Neither Sen. John Kerry nor Sen. John Edwards could be counted on to vote at all,' wrote Chris Jehle in a letter to the San Francisco Chronicle. 'And I, as a gay man deprived of my right to marry the man I've loved for the past 23 years, am supposed to vote for these two come November? What have they done to earn my vote?'

Perhaps Jehle should be grateful that they are willing to take his money.


This article shared 4497 times since Wed Jul 21, 2004
facebook twitter google +1 reddit email





Windy City Media Group does not approve or necessarily agree with the views posted below.
Please do not post letters to the editor here. Please also be civil in your dialogue.
If you need to be mean, just know that the longer you stay on this page, the more you help us.


  ARTICLES YOU MIGHT LIKE

Gay News

Starting May 3, ceremonies in Cook County's downtown Marriage Court can be performed by Zoom 2021-04-30
- CHICAGO (April 30) — Marriage and civil union ceremonies at Cook County's downtown Marriage and Civil Union Court (Marriage Court) may be performed via Zoom videoconference, as well as in person, starting next week, according to ...


Gay News

Illinois Senate passes proposal removing gendered language from marriage certificates 2021-04-21
--From a press release - On April 21, on its third reading, the Illinois Senate passed (by a bipartisan vote of 44-13) a proposal that amends the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act to allow the removal of gendered language ...


Gay News

Russian leader Putin officially bans same-sex marriage 2021-04-08
- On April 5, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed into law a series of constitutional amendments that, among other things, formally defines marriage as between a man and a woman in the country, The Washington Blade reported. ...


Gay News

Global momentum for marriage equality surges,"Freedom to Marry Global" website created 2021-03-31
--From a freedomtomarry.org press release - April 1st marks twenty years since the Netherlands ended the exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage, becoming the first of so far 30 countries worldwide to affirm the freedom to marry for same-sex couples. Now, two ...


Gay News

WORLD Landmark ruling, Montreal's Gay Village, acid attack, anti-LGBTQ laws 2021-03-21
- In a landmark ruling, a Japanese court ruled that the government's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, NPR noted. Article 24 of Japan's constitution defines marriage as based on the "mutual consent of both sexes," which ...


Gay News

LETTER The Vatican's words and actions do not echo love 2021-03-18
- The LGBTQA community is responding with shock, anger and frustration at the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith statement concerning same-sex unions. Many in our community can't understand why Pope Francis would allow such a ...


Gay News

Pope Francis documentary 'Francesco' to debut March 26 2021-03-16
- Pope Francis—in the news lately because of the Catholic Church's stance that it cannot bless same-sex unions, adding that it is "not licit" to bless relationships that involve sexual activity outside of marriage—is the subject of ...


Gay News

DignityUSA: Vatican denying same-sex blessings "Exacerbates pain and anger" 2021-03-16
--From a press release - March 15, 2021. DignityUSA, the organization of Catholics working for justice, equality, and full inclusion of LGBTQI people in the church and society, is deeply disappointed by the Vatican's statement unequivocally denying blessings to same-sex coupl ...


Gay News

Vatican won't bless same-sex unions 2021-03-15
- The Catholic Church said it cannot bless same-sex unions, adding that it is "not licit" to bless relationships that involve sexual activity outside of marriage, according to an NBC News item. The Congregation for the Doctrine ...


Gay News

Commission: Jamaica should repeal same-sex ban 2021-02-18
- The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), the top rights body of the Americas, said in a symbolic landmark ruling on Feb. 17 that Jamaica should repeal its colonial-era gay sex ban, Reuters reported. Two Jamaicans ...


Gay News

Leading groups submit amicus briefs against discrimination against LGBT surviving spouses 2021-02-08
--From a press release - WASHINGTON D.C.—AARP, AARP Foundation, SAGE and the American Society on Aging (ASA) filed amicus briefs today in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit arguing that the ...


Gay News

WORLD Honduran Congress, deportation, Canadian support, athlete comes out 2021-01-24
- On Jan. 21, members of the Honduran Congress voted to amend the constitution, making it much harder to reverse existing hard-line bans on abortion and same-sex marriage, as lawmakers double down on socially conservative priorities, Openly ...


Gay News

NATIONAL Marriage proposal, Creating Change, mural erased, 'Queer Santa' 2021-01-05
- A COVID-19 vaccine appointment at a Canton, South Dakota, hospital turned into a marriage proposal for one healthcare couple, CNN.com noted. Robbie Vargas-Cortes, 31, a paramedic and EMS supervisor, was scheduled to get his vaccination on ...


Gay News

WORLD Lithuania outlook, HIV/AIDS and COVID, lawyer arrested, trans youth 2020-12-27
- Lithuania appears set to legalize same-sex civil partnerships next year, but same-sex marriage could be up to a decade away, according to Tomas Raskevicius—the country's only openly LGBT+ lawmaker, Reuters reported. "We're going to submit t ...


Gay News

Switzerland's parliament okays marriage equality, residents to have final say 2020-12-18
- On Dec. 18, the Swiss parliament approved a bill allowing same-sex couples to marry, finally bringing the nation in line with much of Europe on LGBTQ rights, TheLocal.ch reported. However, the Swiss residents themselves will have ...


 



Copyright © 2021 Windy City Media Group. All rights reserved.
Reprint by permission only. PDFs for back issues are downloadable from
our online archives. Single copies of back issues in print form are
available for $4 per issue, older than one month for $6 if available,
by check to the mailing address listed below.

Return postage must accompany all manuscripts, drawings, and
photographs submitted if they are to be returned, and no
responsibility may be assumed for unsolicited materials.
All rights to letters, art and photos sent to Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago
Gay and Lesbian News and Feature Publication) will be treated
as unconditionally assigned for publication purposes and as such,
subject to editing and comment. The opinions expressed by the
columnists, cartoonists, letter writers, and commentators are
their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of Nightspots
(Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay,
Lesbian, Bisexual and Transegender News and Feature Publication).

The appearance of a name, image or photo of a person or group in
Nightspots (Chicago GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times
(a Chicago Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender News and Feature
Publication) does not indicate the sexual orientation of such
individuals or groups. While we encourage readers to support the
advertisers who make this newspaper possible, Nightspots (Chicago
GLBT Nightlife News) and Windy City Times (a Chicago Gay, Lesbian
News and Feature Publication) cannot accept responsibility for
any advertising claims or promotions.

 

 

 

TRENDINGBREAKINGPHOTOS






Donate


About WCMG      Contact Us      Online Front  Page      Windy City  Times      Nightspots      OUT! Guide     
Identity      BLACKlines      En La Vida      Archives      Advanced Search     
Windy City Queercast      Queercast Archives     
Press  Releases      Join WCMG  Email List      Email Blast      Blogs     
Upcoming Events      Todays Events      Ongoing Events      Bar Guide      Community Groups      In Memoriam      Outguide Categories      Outguide Advertisers      Search Outguide      Travel      Dining Out      Privacy Policy     

Windy City Media Group publishes Windy City Times,
The Bi-Weekly Voice of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Trans Community.
5315 N. Clark St. #192, Chicago, IL 60640-2113 • PH (773) 871-7610 • FAX (773) 871-7609.